Work

I do not publish client names or project details without purpose. What matters is the type of work, the depth of thinking, and the outcomes it produces.

Below is a clear picture of where I operate and what I bring to the table.

Enterprise Release Governance

Large organisations ship software across dozens of teams, shared environments, and interconnected systems. Without governance, every release is a coordination risk.

I design and implement release governance structures that give teams autonomy within boundaries — defined gates, clear ownership, and traceability from commit to production. The goal is not to slow things down. It is to make speed safe.

What this looks like

System-Level Redesign

Most system problems are not caused by bad code. They are caused by architectural decisions that made sense three years ago and have since been outgrown.

I help teams see the whole system — not just the component that is failing — and redesign at the structural level. This means dependency analysis, boundary redefinition, and migration planning that accounts for what is already in production.

What this looks like

AI Workflow Integration

AI does not live in isolation. It sits inside a workflow, depends on data from upstream systems, and produces outputs that downstream processes rely on. If any of that is undefined, the model is a liability.

I integrate AI into existing operational workflows with the same rigour applied to any production component — defined inputs, bounded scope, monitoring, and fallback behaviour.

What this looks like

Production Risk Reduction

Production incidents are expensive. Not just in downtime, but in trust — with customers, with leadership, with the team itself.

I work with teams to identify and reduce structural production risk before it becomes an incident. This is not about adding more alerts. It is about fixing the conditions that make incidents likely in the first place.

What this looks like

Working Together

If any of this reflects the kind of challenge your team is facing, I would welcome a conversation. I work best with leaders who already know something needs to change — and want a structured path to get there.